Vaginal rejuvenation
August 31, 2007It’s pretty obvious I’ve been out of touch with the medical profession for awhile. Otherwise I wouldn’t have fallen off of the couch when I read a story this morning on the above named subject.
According to ABC News, more and more young women are visiting their gynecologists for a procedure variously referred to as “vaginal rejuvenation, designer vaginoplasty, revirgination, labia reduction” and “G-spot amplification” The purpose of these procedures seems to be a more attractive vagina but in many cases, pain reduction is the goal.
The procedure has become so frequent that the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has issued guidance to its membership, pointing out that cosmetic vaginal surgery should be avoided, although surgery to relieve pain is appropriate. Regarding enhancement, however, some physicians argue that people should be able to make their own decision as long as a physician provides information about the possible outcomes.
When it comes to men, the history of enhancement is clear. From time immemorial, men have attempted to enhance their natural equipment with all sorts of balms, powders, salves, concoctions, and penile muscle exercises. Now, with advances in modern medicine, men opt more and more for another failed approach, the “penile enlargement” medical procedure. In this bizarre operation, a physician implants some sort of device in and around a male’s equipment. Too many of these devices fall short of their intended purpose.
Regarding female vaginal enhancements, one thing bears mention. The basic purpose of these procedures is to enhance beauty not enlarge size. This puzzles me. Speaking only for myself, I’ve never seen an ugly vagina. In the context of our conversation here, I ask, what is “beautiful?” How does a woman assess her own personal vaginal attractiveness? Does she throw an overnight vaginal inspection pillow party? Or does some man commit the fatal error of telling her that her vagina is ugly? If such a man exists, he fully deserves to float forever through the icy netherworld of celibacy.
Although I josh, I am still puzzled over the methods women use and the standards against which they measures vaginal beauty. How does a girl determine that her vagina is or is not beautiful? Obviously, there’s a logical missing link in my mind. Perhaps it’s the element of emotion and a desire to conform to a youth cultural standard invisible to anyone over the age of 30.
In any event, vaginal enhancement is a thriving economic activity. I’ve run across a few enhancement clinics in the course of my hurried and haphazard research for this post. Most of them are in Los Angeles and New York. However, I’d stake some money on the proposition that the center of universal hedonism, San Francisco, has more than its share of Reconstructive Vaginologists.
Posted by Angelo Saxon